Skip to content

Tenure Comp Intelligence · Use case

Defensible comp reports for leadership

Bring bands leadership can verify, with the source count and refresh date on every figure, so the question of where the numbers came from has a 30-second answer.

Walk in with bands leadership can verify

You are presenting comp recommendations to the leadership who sign off pay, and they will ask three things: where the numbers came from, how recent they are, and what the spread inside the band looks like. If you cannot answer all three with specifics, the discussion stalls and the meeting reschedules. The high-credibility option today is a Mercer report you cite by its methodology section, at tens of thousands and an annual cycle that is often stale by sign-off day. The low-cost option is a Hays guide footnote you hope no one probes. The middle option is a recruiter quote that holds until someone asks how many placements that recruiter ran last quarter. You need a reference leadership can reproduce, not a slide that says source: market data.

How Tenure solves it

Tenure puts the evidence leadership will ask for on the same row as the number.

Every band in the dashboard shows its source count and its source breakdown: job postings, JD signal mining, LinkedIn open-salary disclosures, and verified candidate submissions. Leadership sees not just the figure but how many data points stand behind it.

The percentile view gives the spread directly. P25, median, and P75 in total monthly cash answer the what-is-the-range question before it is asked, across UAE and Saudi.

CSV export carries the bands and their source counts together, ready to drop into the pack appendix. The figure and its evidence stay attached through the paste.

The public methodology page documents the sourcing, the sample-size policy, and the percentile approach at a link you can put on the sources slide. Anyone who wants to inspect the method can read it independently, which is the opposite of asking them to trust a black box.

The workflow, step by step

Pull the sector ladder for the roles under review. Export the bands with their source counts to CSV. Drop the CSV into the appendix of your pack and lift the headline bands onto the recommendation slide. Add the methodology link to your sources slide. Cite each band the same way: Pay Index, the refresh quarter, and the verified source count, for example Pay Index, Q2 2026, 18 sources verified. When someone asks where the numbers came from, the answer is already on the slide: three to ten or more verified sources per band, quarterly refresh, methodology published, link included. The source question becomes a 30-second answer rather than a three-meeting cycle, and the recommendation moves on its merits.

Sample bands

The table at the foot of this page shows representative Investment Management bands, pulled live from the same Pay Index that feeds your export, so the figure on the slide matches the figure on the screen. The full view covers all 12 sectors across UAE and Saudi, with the source count on every row. Open the dashboard to pull the exact roles under review.

FAQs

What goes into a defensible comp report? A defensible comp report carries the recommended bands, the market reference behind each one, the recency of that reference, and the spread inside the band. Tenure supplies the last three: P25, median, and P75 per role and level, the source count behind each figure, and the refresh date. Export the bands with source counts to CSV, drop them into the pack appendix, and link the methodology page on your sources slide so leadership can inspect the approach on their own time.

How do I cite Tenure data in a board paper? Cite it the way you would cite any primary source: name, date, and sample. The format is Tenure Pay Index, the refresh quarter, and the number of verified sources behind the band, for example Pay Index, Q2 2026, 18 verified sources. Add the link to the public methodology page on your sources slide. That gives leadership a citation they can reproduce, rather than a slide footer that reads market data with nothing behind it.

Do I need primary-source data when leadership signs off pay? If leadership asks where the numbers came from, yes. A recruiter range or a survey median with no sample behind it stalls the discussion the moment someone asks how many data points support it. Primary-source data means each band names its evidence: Tenure shows the source count and the source mix on every row, and publishes no band on fewer than three sources. That is what turns the source question from a reschedule into a 30-second answer.

Build the pack from sourced bands

Pull the bands under review, export them with source counts, and link the methodology on your sources slide. The full approach behind every figure is public at the methodology page.

Sample ladder · Investment Management

One representative band per seniority level. Full Investment Management coverage has 17 published bands.

RoleLevelLocationP25MedianP75n
ESG / Impact Investment AnalystAnalystRiyadh, SaudiSAR 23,758SAR 27,950SAR 32,143n=3
Portfolio ManagerManagerRiyadh, SaudiSAR 40,885SAR 48,100SAR 55,315n=3
VC Principal / PartnerPrincipalDubai, UAEAED 82,875AED 97,500AED 112,125n=3
Vice PresidentVPRiyadh, SaudiSAR 33,150SAR 39,000SAR 44,850n=3
PartnerPartnerRiyadh, SaudiSAR 71,825SAR 84,500SAR 97,175n=3
Chief Investment OfficerC-LevelAbu Dhabi, UAEAED 63,538AED 74,750AED 85,963n=3

Tenure Comp Intelligence · Defensible comp reports for leadership

Pull the full ladder from day one.

$299/mo or $2,999/yr (saves $589 a year). Cancel anytime · 14-day money-back guarantee.